While you can purchase 1,000 stickers for $25, I chose to test without them. I took the mevo to my golf course and hit shots with several clubs to see if there were any significant differences.įlightscope recommends that you use metallic stickers on the balls to get the most accuracy. The launch monitor would have more room to see the ball travel, and I know many golfers are interested in using it as a companion at the driving range. I was more interested in how the FlightScope mevo would perform outdoors.
![what your mevo app software version is what your mevo app software version is](https://2crjvz34nak04zfxr2wbkfzg-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/mevo-app.jpg)
#What your mevo app software version is full#
If you want more accuracy and a full simulation of your ball flight, then you should look at a unit like SkyTrak (but considerably more expensive at $2000).
![what your mevo app software version is what your mevo app software version is](https://www.cnet.com/a/img/4rcYtlDQaqk_wISWdbDXp7_RL54=/1200x630/2017/10/23/dead1f68-0366-45c8-ba76-afbb1549a336/03-livestream-mevo-plus.jpg)
You are getting metrics that are in the ballpark at a relatively low price point. Long story short – if you have space in your house, I think the mevo can work for you. I would chalk this up to the limitations of using radar indoors in a smaller space. On the whole, I think it did miss a few more shots than my SkyTrak unit, and occasionally it would record spin rates that were completely wrong. But once I found the optimal spot for the unit it was mostly registering the correct measurements. This a little frustrating in the beginning because it required extra effort to record my shots. If you don’t get all of these just right, it will miss your shots. In the app you have to select that you are using the mevo indoors, enter precisely how far it is behind the ball, and the club you are using for each shot. One other issue I found is that the FlightScope mevo is extremely sensitive to its placement and app configuration. But you have to take everything with a grain of salt because if you want that kind of accuracy, you have to pay more for it. Would I trust it for club fitting or any other activity that requires exact precision? Probably not. For a radar-based unit that only costs $500, I was getting pretty good data on most parameters. On the whole, I was impressed with the results indoors when I took into account its limitations. If you are looking for a quality net to go along with the FlightScope mevo, we recommend reading our Spornia SPG-7 review. The numbers were inconsistent from shot to shot and I don’t have a high degree of confidence that they were accurate. Lastly, I think the weakest metric it measured was launch angle. Because of this, the mevo was displaying the total height of my shots more elevated than they probably were. So my spin rates were a little bit higher than usual (but in the ballpark). I am a very low-spin player and have tested my numbers on most commercial launch monitors like Trackman and Foresight. I get the sense that the mevo was also overstating spin rates.
#What your mevo app software version is driver#
The only caveat was with the driver – I found the mevo to be overstating my carry distance a little too much. The ball speed was very close to the SkyTrak unit as well. I found the mevo to be mostly accurate with carry distances, which in my opinion is the most critical metric for a launch monitor like this. Here are my results on key launch parameters versus my SkyTrak unit: Club/Launch Monitor For indoor use, this makes sense since you can use the same balls. SkyTrak has become an attractive option for recreational golfers indoors at $2,000, and I used it as a “control” for the test to see how the mevo measured against it.Īdditionally, Flightscope recommends using a metallic sticker on your ball so it can accurately measure spin rates. Launch monitors using camera technology (photometric) are best for indoor use because they measure the ball at impact. So if you don’t have upwards of 12-15 feet for the unit to measure, you can likely assume that indoor usage will not produce the most accurate results. Their website recommends having 4-7 feet behind the ball, and 8 feet in front of the ball for optimal conditions (which I had in my testing). This can be an issue for many golfers because most of us don’t have a ton of space for an indoor practice area. The FlightScope mevo uses radar technology to measure ball flight, which means that it needs more space to see the ball travel.
![what your mevo app software version is what your mevo app software version is](https://www.golfswingsystems.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/mevoFamily1g.png)
I was curious to see where mevo fit in, so I tested it both indoors and outdoors to see how it stacked up regarding accuracy and ease-of-use. Each of them has their strengths and weaknesses. I’ve tested almost every launch monitor on the market at various price points ranging from $299 all the way up to $20,000. Additionally, they offer an app which records your data for each session and allows for swing video analysis.